So Costello is calling Howard a lier. And Howard is calling Costello a lier and arrogant.
So nothing we didn't already know.
But it does highlight how much people seem to trust one or the other DESPITE the fact that they are politicians and their use of language in the media over the years is designed to confuse the meaning of their statements. Like Howard's core and non-core promices, which is a sidestep, a get-out-clause.
And yet, no one as asking the major questions, like if neither man is saying the other is to be believed, surely this means their credibility on important issues, such as, for instance, AWB, may be in question.
But no, it's one cult of personality versus another that is at stake at the moment, not a review of Government credibility as a whole.
Of course the government's creditbility has constantly been called into question recently, on AWB, on their Senate majority and workplace relations over the last few months. These issues haven't been affecting property prices, or people's mortgages and so on, so people can ignore it. Especially for the "aspirant" people, those of who, Howard has been repeating a mantra of wealth, wealth, wealth, the economy is great and we are all richer. Those people who put themselves into debt trying to buy over-priced properties. It seems previously that a lot of people simply don't care that Howard or Costello may have been at best ambigious with their language, or at worst lied.
No. What has sparked off this debate is thie latest leadership twist, which has people talking and Sunrise and Today sitting on the PMs front doorstep first thing this morning. Celebrity and the cult of personality has started this debate, not a question of transparent, truthful governance.
And there lies the problem. While the Liberals air their dirty laundry, their sheets are obscuring the logical debate of whether, if they don't trust each other, and each says, should the Australian people trust either. Should we revisit previous promises and statements both men have given since being elected and see if they stand up to scrutiny?
Yes. But will people? Which is a pity, because the next time Howard says that all Australians says this or that, I would like someone to ask how he knows. And who has he asked. And if people who disagree with him are un-Australian.
Instead of ignoring what politicians say because it doesn't affect our mortgage, or we are too cynical to bother, maybe we shoud ask the politicians to be accountable to their statements. All statement.